Int. J. Advanced Structures & Geotechnical Engineering
ISSN 2319-5347, ISI Impact Factor: 0.763
VOLUME 03 NO. 03 JULY 2014:
Title:
Cost optimization of column
Authors: S. Bari, A. A.
Mamun
Abstract:
The ratio of longitudinal steel area to gross
concrete section is in the range from 0.01 to 0.08,
according to BNBC/ACI Code. The common practice is to
choose an arbitrary section and check that for bending
and axial load with a reinforcement ratio around 2-3%
but we don’t know whether it is economical or not.
However, for a particular moment and load there is only
one section which is economical, it means only for a
certain percentage of reinforcement the section will be
optimized. Since the cost of concrete and reinforcement
are different which may increase or decrease
independently, the percentage of reinforcement in the
optimized section varies with the price ratio of steel
to concrete. Analysing for the present cost ratio of
steel and concrete, it is seen that a column section is
optimized at 1 percent of reinforcement for low-rise to
medium rise building. This is true for any column that
after a certain price ratio it is optimized at
reinforcement of the order of 1 percent on that loading
and moment condition. Use of high strength concrete in
the column has an effect of minimizing the cost. Using
5000 psi concrete instead of 3000 psi concrete saves
20-50 percent of total cost in general. For same axial
load and moment resisting capacity, a circular column is
found to be more costly than a square column. Also, the
cost differences between circular and square column
increase with the increase in gross area of concrete.
Page no: 228-233